Side-by-side MCP server comparison
Short answer: it is close. Apify MCP Server scores 94/100 and Firecrawl MCP Server scores 95/100 — a 1-point gap, which is inside the noise of a weekly rescore. Firecrawl MCP Server exposes 4 tools against Apify MCP Server's 1, so the choice comes down to whether you need that extra surface area or would rather keep your context window small.
Last updated
| Metric | Apify Mcp Server | Firecrawl Mcp Server |
|---|---|---|
| MCPpedia Score | 94 | 95 |
| Security Score | 30 | 30 |
| Maintenance Score | 19 | 20 |
| GitHub Stars | 5.0k | 7.3k |
| Weekly Downloads | 56.2k | 47.5k |
| Tools | 1 | 4 |
| Est. Token Cost | 150 | 600 |
| Open CVEs | 0 | 0 |
| Health | Active | Active |
| Auth Required | No | No |
| Transport | stdio, sse, http | stdio, sse, http |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| API Pricing | freemium | freemium |
Firecrawl Mcp Server and Apify Mcp Server are closely matched at the top with scores of 95 and 94. Check each server's detail page to decide which fits your use case.
Compare up to 4 servers: mcppedia.org/compare/server-a-vs-server-b-vs-server-c