Side-by-side MCP server comparison
Short answer: it is close. Argo scores 90/100 and io.github.vshulcz/deja-vu scores 94/100 - a 4-point gap, which is inside the noise of a weekly rescore. io.github.vshulcz/deja-vu exposes 6 tools against Argo's 1, so the choice comes down to whether you need that extra surface area or would rather keep your context window small.
Last updated
| Metric | Argo | io.github.vshulcz/deja-vu |
|---|---|---|
| MCPpedia Score | 90 | 94 |
| Security Score | 30 | 30 |
| Maintenance Score | 15 | 19 |
| GitHub Stars | 200 | 1.3k |
| Weekly Downloads | 57.8k | 1.2k |
| Tools | 1 | 6 |
| Est. Token Cost | 150 | 900 |
| Open CVEs | 0 | 0 |
| Health | Active | Active |
| Auth Required | No | No |
| Transport | stdio, sse, http | stdio, sse |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| API Pricing | unknown | freemium |
io.github.vshulcz/deja-vu and Argo are closely matched at the top with scores of 94 and 90. Check each server's detail page to decide which fits your use case.
Compare up to 4 servers: mcppedia.org/compare/server-a-vs-server-b-vs-server-c