Side-by-side MCP server comparison
Short answer: it is close. Claude Flow scores 95/100 and Dsh MCP Client scores 97/100 — a 2-point gap, which is inside the noise of a weekly rescore. they are close enough on every measure that the deciding factor is which upstream service you already use.
Last updated
| Metric | Claude Flow | Dsh MCP Client |
|---|---|---|
| MCPpedia Score | 95 | 97 |
| Security Score | 30 | 30 |
| Maintenance Score | 20 | 22 |
| GitHub Stars | 69.3k | 193.9k |
| Weekly Downloads | 22.0k | 649.3k |
| Tools | 4 | 4 |
| Est. Token Cost | 600 | 600 |
| Open CVEs | 0 | 0 |
| Health | Active | Active |
| Auth Required | No | No |
| Transport | stdio, sse, http | stdio |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| API Pricing | unknown | unknown |
Dsh MCP Client and Claude Flow are closely matched at the top with scores of 97 and 95. Check each server's detail page to decide which fits your use case.
Compare up to 4 servers: mcppedia.org/compare/server-a-vs-server-b-vs-server-c