Side-by-side MCP server comparison
Short answer: pick MCP GitLab. It scores 96/100 to com.luthersystems.insideout/mcp's 90/100, and it exposes 12 tools to com.luthersystems.insideout/mcp's 8, and it has 2,057 GitHub stars against 0. com.luthersystems.insideout/mcp is still worth a look if you are already invested in it - the full breakdown below shows exactly where the 6 points go.
Last updated
| Metric | com.luthersystems.insideout/mcp | Mcp Gitlab |
|---|---|---|
| MCPpedia Score | 90 | 96 |
| Security Score | 30 | 30 |
| Maintenance Score | 15 | 21 |
| GitHub Stars | 0 | 2.1k |
| Weekly Downloads | 2263.3k | 103.9k |
| Tools | 8 | 12 |
| Est. Token Cost | 1.2k | 1.8k |
| Open CVEs | 0 | 0 |
| Health | Active | Active |
| Auth Required | No | No |
| Transport | http, stdio | stdio |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| API Pricing | unknown | freemium |
Mcp Gitlab leads with a score of 96 (A), ahead of com.luthersystems.insideout/mcp's 90 (A).
Compare up to 4 servers: mcppedia.org/compare/server-a-vs-server-b-vs-server-c