Side-by-side MCP server comparison
Short answer: it is close. com.monday/monday.com scores 94/100 and Simple Memory Extension MCP Server scores 92/100 — a 2-point gap, which is inside the noise of a weekly rescore. com.monday/monday.com exposes 4 tools against Simple Memory Extension MCP Server's 8, so the choice comes down to whether you need that extra surface area or would rather keep your context window small.
Last updated
| Metric | com.monday/monday.com | Simple Memory Extension MCP Server |
|---|---|---|
| MCPpedia Score | 94 | 92 |
| Security Score | 30 | 30 |
| Maintenance Score | 19 | 17 |
| GitHub Stars | 420 | 0 |
| Weekly Downloads | 2.3k | 15476.0k |
| Tools | 4 | 8 |
| Est. Token Cost | 600 | 1.2k |
| Open CVEs | 0 | 0 |
| Health | Active | Active |
| Auth Required | No | No |
| Transport | stdio, sse, http | stdio, sse |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| API Pricing | freemium | free |
com.monday/monday.com and Simple Memory Extension MCP Server are closely matched at the top with scores of 94 and 92. Check each server's detail page to decide which fits your use case.
Compare up to 4 servers: mcppedia.org/compare/server-a-vs-server-b-vs-server-c