Side-by-side MCP server comparison
Short answer: it is close. Dsh MCP Client scores 97/100 and io.github.Atomic-Mail/mcp scores 94/100 — a 3-point gap, which is inside the noise of a weekly rescore. Dsh MCP Client exposes 4 tools against io.github.Atomic-Mail/mcp's 1, so the choice comes down to whether you need that extra surface area or would rather keep your context window small.
Last updated
| Metric | Dsh MCP Client | io.github.Atomic-Mail/mcp |
|---|---|---|
| MCPpedia Score | 97 | 94 |
| Security Score | 30 | 29 |
| Maintenance Score | 22 | 20 |
| GitHub Stars | 196.7k | 261 |
| Weekly Downloads | 592.2k | 15493.7k |
| Tools | 4 | 1 |
| Est. Token Cost | 600 | 150 |
| Open CVEs | 0 | 0 |
| Health | Active | Active |
| Auth Required | No | No |
| Transport | stdio | stdio, sse, http |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| API Pricing | unknown | freemium |
Dsh MCP Client and io.github.Atomic-Mail/mcp are closely matched at the top with scores of 97 and 94. Dsh MCP Client edges ahead on security. Check each server's detail page to decide which fits your use case.
Compare up to 4 servers: mcppedia.org/compare/server-a-vs-server-b-vs-server-c