Side-by-side MCP server comparison
Short answer: it is close. Dsh MCP Client scores 97/100 and Mcp_agent_mail scores 96/100 — a 1-point gap, which is inside the noise of a weekly rescore. Dsh MCP Client exposes 4 tools against Mcp_agent_mail's 6, so the choice comes down to whether you need that extra surface area or would rather keep your context window small.
Last updated
| Metric | Dsh MCP Client | Mcp_agent_mail |
|---|---|---|
| MCPpedia Score | 97 | 96 |
| Security Score | 30 | 30 |
| Maintenance Score | 22 | 21 |
| GitHub Stars | 193.9k | 2.1k |
| Weekly Downloads | 649.3k | 19188.3k |
| Tools | 4 | 6 |
| Est. Token Cost | 600 | 900 |
| Open CVEs | 0 | 0 |
| Health | Active | Active |
| Auth Required | No | No |
| Transport | stdio | http |
| License | MIT | NOASSERTION |
| API Pricing | unknown | free |
Dsh MCP Client and Mcp_agent_mail are closely matched at the top with scores of 97 and 96. Check each server's detail page to decide which fits your use case.
Compare up to 4 servers: mcppedia.org/compare/server-a-vs-server-b-vs-server-c