Side-by-side MCP server comparison
Short answer: it is close. Firecrawl MCP Server scores 95/100 and Supabase MCP Server scores 96/100 — a 1-point gap, which is inside the noise of a weekly rescore. they are close enough on every measure that the deciding factor is which upstream service you already use.
Last updated
| Metric | Firecrawl Mcp Server | Supabase MCP Server |
|---|---|---|
| MCPpedia Score | 95 | 96 |
| Security Score | 30 | 30 |
| Maintenance Score | 20 | 21 |
| GitHub Stars | 7.3k | 2.9k |
| Weekly Downloads | 47.5k | 2.7k |
| Tools | 4 | 4 |
| Est. Token Cost | 600 | 600 |
| Open CVEs | 0 | 0 |
| Health | Active | Active |
| Auth Required | No | No |
| Transport | stdio, sse, http | http, stdio |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| API Pricing | freemium | freemium |
Supabase MCP Server and Firecrawl Mcp Server are closely matched at the top with scores of 96 and 95. Check each server's detail page to decide which fits your use case.
Compare up to 4 servers: mcppedia.org/compare/server-a-vs-server-b-vs-server-c