Side-by-side MCP server comparison
Short answer: it is close. Genai Toolbox scores 93/100 and Supabase MCP Server scores 96/100 — a 3-point gap, which is inside the noise of a weekly rescore. Supabase MCP Server exposes 4 tools against Genai Toolbox's 2, so the choice comes down to whether you need that extra surface area or would rather keep your context window small.
Last updated
| Metric | Genai Toolbox | Supabase MCP Server |
|---|---|---|
| MCPpedia Score | 93 | 96 |
| Security Score | 28 | 30 |
| Maintenance Score | 20 | 21 |
| GitHub Stars | 16.3k | 2.9k |
| Weekly Downloads | 21.8k | 3.2k |
| Tools | 2 | 4 |
| Est. Token Cost | 300 | 600 |
| Open CVEs | 0 | 0 |
| Health | Active | Active |
| Auth Required | No | No |
| Transport | stdio, sse, http | http, stdio |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| API Pricing | freemium | freemium |
Supabase MCP Server and Genai Toolbox are closely matched at the top with scores of 96 and 93. Supabase MCP Server edges ahead on security. Check each server's detail page to decide which fits your use case.
Compare up to 4 servers: mcppedia.org/compare/server-a-vs-server-b-vs-server-c