Side-by-side MCP server comparison
Short answer: it is close. Ida Pro MCP scores 92/100 and io.github.bitterdev/enpass-mcp scores 90/100 — a 2-point gap, which is inside the noise of a weekly rescore. Ida Pro MCP exposes 3 tools against io.github.bitterdev/enpass-mcp's 7, so the choice comes down to whether you need that extra surface area or would rather keep your context window small.
Last updated
| Metric | Ida Pro Mcp | io.github.bitterdev/enpass-mcp |
|---|---|---|
| MCPpedia Score | 92 | 90 |
| Security Score | 30 | 30 |
| Maintenance Score | 17 | 15 |
| GitHub Stars | 11.6k | 1 |
| Weekly Downloads | 0 | 15476.0k |
| Tools | 3 | 7 |
| Est. Token Cost | 450 | 1.1k |
| Open CVEs | 0 | 0 |
| Health | Active | Active |
| Auth Required | No | No |
| Transport | stdio, sse, http | stdio, sse |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| API Pricing | paid | freemium |
Ida Pro Mcp and io.github.bitterdev/enpass-mcp are closely matched at the top with scores of 92 and 90. Check each server's detail page to decide which fits your use case.
Compare up to 4 servers: mcppedia.org/compare/server-a-vs-server-b-vs-server-c