Side-by-side MCP server comparison
Short answer: it is close. XcodeBuildMCP scores 95/100 and Ruflo scores 95/100 — a 0-point gap, which is inside the noise of a weekly rescore. XcodeBuildMCP exposes 1 tools against Ruflo's 4, so the choice comes down to whether you need that extra surface area or would rather keep your context window small.
Last updated
| Metric | XcodeBuildMCP | Ruflo |
|---|---|---|
| MCPpedia Score | 95 | 95 |
| Security Score | 30 | 30 |
| Maintenance Score | 20 | 20 |
| GitHub Stars | 6.3k | 69.4k |
| Weekly Downloads | 169.4k | 47.4k |
| Tools | 1 | 4 |
| Est. Token Cost | 150 | 600 |
| Open CVEs | 0 | 0 |
| Health | Active | Active |
| Auth Required | No | No |
| Transport | stdio | stdio, sse, http |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| API Pricing | free | free |
XcodeBuildMCP and Ruflo are closely matched at the top with scores of 95 and 95. Check each server's detail page to decide which fits your use case.
Compare up to 4 servers: mcppedia.org/compare/server-a-vs-server-b-vs-server-c