Side-by-side MCP server comparison
Short answer: pick io.github.firebase/firebase-mcp. It scores 94/100 to Sample Multi Tenant Saas MCP Server's 88/100, and it is published by the vendor behind the API rather than by a third party, and it has 4,477 GitHub stars against 19. Sample Multi Tenant Saas MCP Server is still worth a look if you are already invested in it - the full breakdown below shows exactly where the 6 points go.
Last updated
| Metric | io.github.firebase/firebase-mcp | Sample Multi Tenant Saas Mcp Server |
|---|---|---|
| MCPpedia Score | 94 | 88 |
| Security Score | 30 | 30 |
| Maintenance Score | 19 | 13 |
| GitHub Stars | 4.5k | 19 |
| Weekly Downloads | 2048.9k | 0 |
| Tools | 3 | 5 |
| Est. Token Cost | 450 | 750 |
| Open CVEs | 0 | 0 |
| Health | Active | Active |
| Auth Required | Yes | Yes |
| Transport | stdio, sse, http | http |
| License | MIT | MIT-0 |
| API Pricing | freemium | paid |
io.github.firebase/firebase-mcp leads with a score of 94 (A), ahead of Sample Multi Tenant Saas Mcp Server's 88 (A).
Compare up to 4 servers: mcppedia.org/compare/server-a-vs-server-b-vs-server-c