Side-by-side MCP server comparison
Short answer: it is close. io.github.mims-harvard/tooluniverse scores 96/100 and XcodeBuildMCP scores 97/100 - a 1-point gap, which is inside the noise of a weekly rescore. XcodeBuildMCP exposes 2 tools against io.github.mims-harvard/tooluniverse's 4, so the choice comes down to whether you need that extra surface area or would rather keep your context window small.
Last updated
| Metric | io.github.mims-harvard/tooluniverse | XcodeBuildMCP |
|---|---|---|
| MCPpedia Score | 96 | 97 |
| Security Score | 30 | 30 |
| Maintenance Score | 21 | 22 |
| GitHub Stars | 1.8k | 6.5k |
| Weekly Downloads | 2263.3k | 38.5k |
| Tools | 4 | 2 |
| Est. Token Cost | 600 | 300 |
| Open CVEs | 0 | 0 |
| Health | Active | Active |
| Auth Required | No | No |
| Transport | stdio, sse, http | stdio |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| API Pricing | free | free |
XcodeBuildMCP and io.github.mims-harvard/tooluniverse are closely matched at the top with scores of 97 and 96. Check each server's detail page to decide which fits your use case.
Compare up to 4 servers: mcppedia.org/compare/server-a-vs-server-b-vs-server-c