Side-by-side MCP server comparison
Short answer: it is close. Komodo MCP Server scores 93/100 and MCP GitLab scores 96/100 — a 3-point gap, which is inside the noise of a weekly rescore. MCP GitLab exposes 12 tools against Komodo MCP Server's 11, so the choice comes down to whether you need that extra surface area or would rather keep your context window small.
Last updated
| Metric | Komodo MCP Server | Mcp Gitlab |
|---|---|---|
| MCPpedia Score | 93 | 96 |
| Security Score | 30 | 30 |
| Maintenance Score | 18 | 21 |
| GitHub Stars | 19 | 1.9k |
| Weekly Downloads | 260.0k | 145.2k |
| Tools | 11 | 12 |
| Est. Token Cost | 1.6k | 1.8k |
| Open CVEs | 0 | 0 |
| Health | Active | Active |
| Auth Required | Yes | No |
| Transport | stdio, sse, http | stdio |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| API Pricing | free | freemium |
Mcp Gitlab and Komodo MCP Server are closely matched at the top with scores of 96 and 93. Check each server's detail page to decide which fits your use case.
Compare up to 4 servers: mcppedia.org/compare/server-a-vs-server-b-vs-server-c