Side-by-side MCP server comparison
Short answer: it is close. io.github.nirholas/xactions scores 92/100 and Ms 365 MCP Server scores 92/100 - a 0-point gap, which is inside the noise of a weekly rescore. io.github.nirholas/xactions exposes 6 tools against Ms 365 MCP Server's 22, so the choice comes down to whether you need that extra surface area or would rather keep your context window small.
Last updated
| Metric | io.github.nirholas/xactions | Ms 365 Mcp Server |
|---|---|---|
| MCPpedia Score | 92 | 92 |
| Security Score | 30 | 30 |
| Maintenance Score | 17 | 21 |
| GitHub Stars | 610 | 1.1k |
| Weekly Downloads | 245 | 38.5k |
| Tools | 6 | 22 |
| Est. Token Cost | 900 | 3.3k |
| Open CVEs | 0 | 0 |
| Health | Active | Active |
| Auth Required | No | Yes |
| Transport | stdio, sse, http | stdio, sse, http |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| API Pricing | freemium | freemium |
io.github.nirholas/xactions and Ms 365 Mcp Server are closely matched at the top with scores of 92 and 92. Check each server's detail page to decide which fits your use case.
Compare up to 4 servers: mcppedia.org/compare/server-a-vs-server-b-vs-server-c