Side-by-side MCP server comparison
Short answer: it is close. io.github.qmmughal/titan-email-mcp scores 91/100 and io.github.team-telnyx/telnyx scores 95/100 - a 4-point gap, which is inside the noise of a weekly rescore. io.github.team-telnyx/telnyx exposes 8 tools against io.github.qmmughal/titan-email-mcp's 6, so the choice comes down to whether you need that extra surface area or would rather keep your context window small.
Last updated
| Metric | io.github.qmmughal/titan-email-mcp | io.github.team-telnyx/telnyx |
|---|---|---|
| MCPpedia Score | 91 | 95 |
| Security Score | 30 | 30 |
| Maintenance Score | 16 | 20 |
| GitHub Stars | 0 | 198 |
| Weekly Downloads | 114 | 238.4k |
| Tools | 6 | 8 |
| Est. Token Cost | 900 | 1.2k |
| Open CVEs | 0 | 0 |
| Health | Active | Active |
| Auth Required | Yes | No |
| Transport | stdio, sse | stdio, sse, http |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| API Pricing | freemium | freemium |
io.github.team-telnyx/telnyx and io.github.qmmughal/titan-email-mcp are closely matched at the top with scores of 95 and 91. Check each server's detail page to decide which fits your use case.
Compare up to 4 servers: mcppedia.org/compare/server-a-vs-server-b-vs-server-c