Side-by-side MCP server comparison
Short answer: it is close. io.github.qmmughal/titan-email-mcp scores 91/100 and Ms 365 MCP Server scores 92/100 - a 1-point gap, which is inside the noise of a weekly rescore. Ms 365 MCP Server exposes 22 tools against io.github.qmmughal/titan-email-mcp's 6, so the choice comes down to whether you need that extra surface area or would rather keep your context window small.
Last updated
| Metric | io.github.qmmughal/titan-email-mcp | Ms 365 Mcp Server |
|---|---|---|
| MCPpedia Score | 91 | 92 |
| Security Score | 30 | 30 |
| Maintenance Score | 16 | 21 |
| GitHub Stars | 0 | 1.1k |
| Weekly Downloads | 114 | 38.5k |
| Tools | 6 | 22 |
| Est. Token Cost | 900 | 3.3k |
| Open CVEs | 0 | 0 |
| Health | Active | Active |
| Auth Required | Yes | Yes |
| Transport | stdio, sse | stdio, sse, http |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| API Pricing | freemium | freemium |
Ms 365 Mcp Server and io.github.qmmughal/titan-email-mcp are closely matched at the top with scores of 92 and 91. Check each server's detail page to decide which fits your use case.
Compare up to 4 servers: mcppedia.org/compare/server-a-vs-server-b-vs-server-c