Side-by-side MCP server comparison
Short answer: pick io.github.RamaAditya49/titen-memory. It scores 92/100 to MCP Server Kubernetes's 85/100, and it scores higher across the weighted security, maintenance and documentation inputs. MCP Server Kubernetes is still worth a look if you are already invested in it — the full breakdown below shows exactly where the 7 points go.
Last updated
| Metric | io.github.RamaAditya49/titen-memory | Mcp Server Kubernetes |
|---|---|---|
| MCPpedia Score | 92 | 85 |
| Security Score | 30 | 30 |
| Maintenance Score | 17 | 14 |
| GitHub Stars | 11 | 1.6k |
| Weekly Downloads | 495 | 0 |
| Tools | 6 | 22 |
| Est. Token Cost | 900 | 3.3k |
| Open CVEs | 0 | 0 |
| Health | Active | Active |
| Auth Required | No | Yes |
| Transport | stdio, sse, http | stdio, sse, http |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| API Pricing | freemium | free |
io.github.RamaAditya49/titen-memory leads with a score of 92 (A), ahead of Mcp Server Kubernetes's 85 (A). However, Mcp Server Kubernetes has more community traction with 1.6k GitHub stars.
Compare up to 4 servers: mcppedia.org/compare/server-a-vs-server-b-vs-server-c