Side-by-side MCP server comparison
Short answer: it is close. io.github.RamaAditya49/titen-memory scores 92/100 and Observability MCP scores 94/100 — a 2-point gap, which is inside the noise of a weekly rescore. Observability MCP exposes 1 tools against io.github.RamaAditya49/titen-memory's 6, so the choice comes down to whether you need that extra surface area or would rather keep your context window small.
Last updated
| Metric | io.github.RamaAditya49/titen-memory | Observability MCP |
|---|---|---|
| MCPpedia Score | 92 | 94 |
| Security Score | 30 | 30 |
| Maintenance Score | 17 | 19 |
| GitHub Stars | 11 | 890 |
| Weekly Downloads | 495 | 26.2k |
| Tools | 6 | 1 |
| Est. Token Cost | 900 | 150 |
| Open CVEs | 0 | 0 |
| Health | Active | Active |
| Auth Required | No | No |
| Transport | stdio, sse, http | stdio, http |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| API Pricing | freemium | freemium |
Observability MCP and io.github.RamaAditya49/titen-memory are closely matched at the top with scores of 94 and 92. Check each server's detail page to decide which fits your use case.
Compare up to 4 servers: mcppedia.org/compare/server-a-vs-server-b-vs-server-c