Side-by-side MCP server comparison
Short answer: it is close. io.github.vshulcz/deja-vu scores 94/100 and MCP Wordpress Remote scores 95/100 - a 1-point gap, which is inside the noise of a weekly rescore. MCP Wordpress Remote exposes 10 tools against io.github.vshulcz/deja-vu's 6, so the choice comes down to whether you need that extra surface area or would rather keep your context window small.
Last updated
| Metric | io.github.vshulcz/deja-vu | MCP Wordpress Remote |
|---|---|---|
| MCPpedia Score | 94 | 95 |
| Security Score | 30 | 30 |
| Maintenance Score | 19 | 20 |
| GitHub Stars | 1.3k | 186 |
| Weekly Downloads | 1.2k | 16.8k |
| Tools | 6 | 10 |
| Est. Token Cost | 900 | 1.5k |
| Open CVEs | 0 | 0 |
| Health | Active | Active |
| Auth Required | No | Yes |
| Transport | stdio, sse | stdio, sse, http |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| API Pricing | freemium | unknown |
MCP Wordpress Remote and io.github.vshulcz/deja-vu are closely matched at the top with scores of 95 and 94. Check each server's detail page to decide which fits your use case.
Compare up to 4 servers: mcppedia.org/compare/server-a-vs-server-b-vs-server-c