Side-by-side MCP server comparison
Short answer: pick MCP GitLab. It scores 96/100 to io.github.zenml-io/mcp-zenml's 91/100, and it has 1,920 GitHub stars against 49. io.github.zenml-io/mcp-zenml is still worth a look if you are already invested in it — the full breakdown below shows exactly where the 5 points go.
Last updated
| Metric | io.github.zenml-io/mcp-zenml | Mcp Gitlab |
|---|---|---|
| MCPpedia Score | 91 | 96 |
| Security Score | 30 | 30 |
| Maintenance Score | 16 | 21 |
| GitHub Stars | 49 | 1.9k |
| Weekly Downloads | 188.2k | 145.2k |
| Tools | 17 | 12 |
| Est. Token Cost | 2.5k | 1.8k |
| Open CVEs | 0 | 0 |
| Health | Active | Active |
| Auth Required | No | No |
| Transport | stdio, sse, http | stdio |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| API Pricing | freemium | freemium |
Mcp Gitlab leads with a score of 96 (A), ahead of io.github.zenml-io/mcp-zenml's 91 (A).
Compare up to 4 servers: mcppedia.org/compare/server-a-vs-server-b-vs-server-c