Side-by-side MCP server comparison
Short answer: pick MCP GitLab. It scores 96/100 to Komodo MCP Server's 88/100, and it exposes 12 tools to Komodo MCP Server's 11, and it has 1,920 GitHub stars against 19. Komodo MCP Server is still worth a look if you are already invested in it — the full breakdown below shows exactly where the 8 points go.
Last updated
| Metric | Komodo Mcp Server | Mcp Gitlab |
|---|---|---|
| MCPpedia Score | 88 | 96 |
| Security Score | 30 | 30 |
| Maintenance Score | 13 | 21 |
| GitHub Stars | 19 | 1.9k |
| Weekly Downloads | 0 | 145.2k |
| Tools | 11 | 12 |
| Est. Token Cost | 1.6k | 1.8k |
| Open CVEs | 0 | 0 |
| Health | Active | Active |
| Auth Required | Yes | No |
| Transport | stdio, sse, http | stdio |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| API Pricing | free | freemium |
Mcp Gitlab leads with a score of 96 (A), ahead of Komodo Mcp Server's 88 (A).
Compare up to 4 servers: mcppedia.org/compare/server-a-vs-server-b-vs-server-c