Side-by-side MCP server comparison
Short answer: pick MCP GitLab. It scores 96/100 to MCP Server Kubernetes's 85/100, and it scores higher across the weighted security, maintenance and documentation inputs. MCP Server Kubernetes is still worth a look if you are already invested in it — the full breakdown below shows exactly where the 11 points go.
Last updated
| Metric | Mcp Gitlab | Mcp Server Kubernetes |
|---|---|---|
| MCPpedia Score | 96 | 85 |
| Security Score | 30 | 30 |
| Maintenance Score | 21 | 14 |
| GitHub Stars | 1.9k | 1.6k |
| Weekly Downloads | 145.2k | 10.8k |
| Tools | 12 | 22 |
| Est. Token Cost | 1.8k | 3.3k |
| Open CVEs | 0 | 0 |
| Health | Active | Active |
| Auth Required | No | Yes |
| Transport | stdio | stdio, sse, http |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| API Pricing | freemium | free |
Mcp Gitlab leads with a score of 96 (A), ahead of Mcp Server Kubernetes's 85 (A).
Compare up to 4 servers: mcppedia.org/compare/server-a-vs-server-b-vs-server-c