Side-by-side MCP server comparison
Short answer: it is close. MCP Server Qdrant scores 92/100 and Supabase MCP Server scores 96/100 — a 4-point gap, which is inside the noise of a weekly rescore. Supabase MCP Server exposes 4 tools against MCP Server Qdrant's 2, so the choice comes down to whether you need that extra surface area or would rather keep your context window small.
Last updated
| Metric | Mcp Server Qdrant | Supabase MCP Server |
|---|---|---|
| MCPpedia Score | 92 | 96 |
| Security Score | 30 | 30 |
| Maintenance Score | 17 | 21 |
| GitHub Stars | 1.5k | 2.9k |
| Weekly Downloads | 7.8k | 2.7k |
| Tools | 2 | 4 |
| Est. Token Cost | 300 | 600 |
| Open CVEs | 0 | 0 |
| Health | Active | Active |
| Auth Required | No | No |
| Transport | stdio, sse, http | http, stdio |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| API Pricing | freemium | freemium |
Supabase MCP Server and Mcp Server Qdrant are closely matched at the top with scores of 96 and 92. Check each server's detail page to decide which fits your use case.
Compare up to 4 servers: mcppedia.org/compare/server-a-vs-server-b-vs-server-c