Side-by-side MCP server comparison
Short answer: it is close. MCP Wordpress Remote scores 95/100 and System1 Agents scores 95/100 - a 0-point gap, which is inside the noise of a weekly rescore. MCP Wordpress Remote exposes 10 tools against System1 Agents's 8, so the choice comes down to whether you need that extra surface area or would rather keep your context window small.
Last updated
| Metric | MCP Wordpress Remote | System1 Agents |
|---|---|---|
| MCPpedia Score | 95 | 95 |
| Security Score | 30 | 30 |
| Maintenance Score | 20 | 20 |
| GitHub Stars | 186 | 166 |
| Weekly Downloads | 16.8k | 2263.3k |
| Tools | 10 | 8 |
| Est. Token Cost | 1.5k | 1.2k |
| Open CVEs | 0 | 0 |
| Health | Active | Active |
| Auth Required | Yes | No |
| Transport | stdio, sse, http | stdio, sse, http |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| API Pricing | unknown | unknown |
MCP Wordpress Remote and System1 Agents are closely matched at the top with scores of 95 and 95. Check each server's detail page to decide which fits your use case.
Compare up to 4 servers: mcppedia.org/compare/server-a-vs-server-b-vs-server-c