Side-by-side MCP server comparison
Short answer: it is close. Modelcontextprotocol scores 96/100 and Tavily MCP scores 96/100 — a 0-point gap, which is inside the noise of a weekly rescore. they are close enough on every measure that the deciding factor is which upstream service you already use.
Last updated
| Metric | Modelcontextprotocol | Tavily Mcp |
|---|---|---|
| MCPpedia Score | 96 | 96 |
| Security Score | 30 | 30 |
| Maintenance Score | 21 | 21 |
| GitHub Stars | 2.5k | 2.4k |
| Weekly Downloads | 0 | 26.6k |
| Tools | 4 | 4 |
| Est. Token Cost | 600 | 600 |
| Open CVEs | 0 | 0 |
| Health | Active | Active |
| Auth Required | No | No |
| Transport | stdio, http | stdio, sse, http |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| API Pricing | freemium | freemium |
Modelcontextprotocol and Tavily Mcp are closely matched at the top with scores of 96 and 96. Check each server's detail page to decide which fits your use case.
Compare up to 4 servers: mcppedia.org/compare/server-a-vs-server-b-vs-server-c