Side-by-side MCP server comparison
Short answer: pick Supabase MCP Server. It scores 96/100 to Streamnative MCP Server's 91/100, and it has 2,872 GitHub stars against 24. Streamnative MCP Server is still worth a look if you are already invested in it — the full breakdown below shows exactly where the 5 points go.
Last updated
| Metric | Streamnative Mcp Server | Supabase MCP Server |
|---|---|---|
| MCPpedia Score | 91 | 96 |
| Security Score | 30 | 30 |
| Maintenance Score | 16 | 21 |
| GitHub Stars | 24 | 2.9k |
| Weekly Downloads | 260.0k | 2.7k |
| Tools | 8 | 4 |
| Est. Token Cost | 1.2k | 600 |
| Open CVEs | 0 | 0 |
| Health | Active | Active |
| Auth Required | No | No |
| Transport | stdio, sse, http | http, stdio |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| API Pricing | freemium | freemium |
Supabase MCP Server leads with a score of 96 (A), ahead of Streamnative Mcp Server's 91 (A).
Compare up to 4 servers: mcppedia.org/compare/server-a-vs-server-b-vs-server-c