Agentic Pentesting MCP server that discovers, exploits, and reports web application vulnerabilities.
MCPpedia last refreshed this data
Autopentest AI is an MCP server that agentic Pentesting MCP server that discovers, exploits, and reports web application vulnerabilities. Its tool list has not been published yet over stdio, sse and http, requires no API key, and scores 80/100 on MCPpedia's security, maintenance and efficiency rubric.
Config is the same across clients - only the file and path differ.
{
"mcpServers": {
"playwright": {
"args": [
"-y",
"@playwright/mcp"
],
"command": "npx"
},
"wstg-pentest": {
"args": [
"--directory",
"./server",
"run",
"server.py"
],
"command": "uv"
}
}
}Are you the author?
Add this badge to your README to show your security score and help users find safe servers.
An agentic pentesting MCP server that automates web application penetration testing using the full OWASP Web Security Testing Guide and PortSwigger Web Security Academy technique references.
Run this in your terminal to verify the server starts. Then let us know if it worked - your result helps other developers.
npx -y '@anthropic-ai/claude-code' 2>&1 | head -1 && echo "✓ Server started successfully"
After testing, let us know if it worked:
Five weighted categories - click any category to see the underlying evidence.
Claude Code: Plugin Hash Pin Bypass Allows Bypass of Hash Pinning
The plugin install flow in Claude Code and Claude Desktop checked out a marketplace's pinned commit SHA using `git checkout` without verifying that the resulting HEAD matched the pinned SHA. An attacker controlling a plugin's upstream repository could create a branch named identically to the pinned 40-character SHA, causing the checkout to silently resolve to the attacker's branch tip instead of the reviewed commit, resulting in attacker-controlled code being installed bypassing the pinned hash.
Claude Code: Sandbox Escape via Git Worktree Path Confusion Allows Unsandboxed Code Execution
Claude Code's worktree handling allowed creation of worktrees named ".git" and navigation to worktrees outside the sandbox context, enabling git directory confusion attacks. By exploiting symlink manipulation and git fsmonitor execution during worktree operations, an attacker could overwrite files in the user's home directory (such as .zshenv), leading to code execution outside of seatbelt sandbox restrictions. Reliably exploiting this required the user to clone a malicious repository containing
@anthropic-ai/claude-code has an Insecure Temporary File in /copy Command that Enables Response Disclosure and Symlink-Based File Write
The Claude Code `/copy` command wrote responses to a hardcoded, predictable path (`/tmp/claude/response.md`) without UID isolation, randomness, or symlink protection. The file was created world-readable (0644) in a world-traversable directory (0755), allowing any local user to read a privileged user's Claude response, which could contain secrets or credentials. Additionally, because the path was static and predictable, a local attacker could pre-create the directory and plant a symlink at the ex
Claude Code: Out-of-Band Data Exfiltration via Pre-Approved HuggingFace Domain in WebFetch
Because the hostname huggingface.co was pre-approved as a bare hostname for the WebFetch tool, any path on that domain—including attacker-controlled model repositories—was auto-approved without a permission prompt or being subject to --allowedTools restrictions. An attacker able to inject untrusted content into a Claude Code context could direct it to issue WebFetch requests against attacker-controlled repository files (e.g. /resolve/main/config.json), which HuggingFace counts as downloads serve
Claude Code: Trust Dialog Bypass via Git Worktree Spoofing Allows Arbitrary Code Execution
Claude Code used the git worktree `commondir` file when determining folder trust but did not validate its contents. By crafting a repository with a `commondir` file pointing to a path the victim had previously trusted, an attacker could bypass the trust dialog and immediately execute malicious hooks defined in `.claude/settings.json`. Exploiting this required the victim to clone a malicious repository and run Claude Code within it, and for the attacker to know or guess a path the victim had alre
Click any tool to inspect its schema.
Be the first to review
Have you used this server?
Share your experience - it helps other developers decide.
Sign in to write a review.
Others in security
Search-first MCP server for JavaScript reverse engineering: 735 tools across 36 domains.
AI-driven malware analysis framework with 30+ integrated tools, web REPL, and MCP server
YouTube transcripts, comments, video details, heatmaps, search, channels and playlists.
MCP server for 1Password service accounts — tools and resources for vaults and credentials
MCP Security Weekly
Get CVE alerts and security updates for Autopentest Ai and similar servers.
Start a conversation
Ask a question, share a tip, or report an issue.
Sign in to join the discussion.