England flood-risk by postcode for AI agents — verified Environment Agency data, not guesses.
Config is the same across clients — only the file and path differ.
{
"mcpServers": {
"io-github-qinisolabs-floodwise": {
"args": [
"-y",
"npm"
],
"command": "npx"
}
}
}Are you the author?
Add this badge to your README to show your security score and help users find safe servers.
England flood-risk by postcode for AI agents — verified Environment Agency data, not guesses.
Run this in your terminal to verify the server starts. Then let us know if it worked — your result helps other developers.
npx -y 'npm' 2>&1 | head -1 && echo "✓ Server started successfully"
After testing, let us know if it worked:
Five weighted categories — click any category to see the underlying evidence.
Packing does not respect root-level ignore files in workspaces
### Impact `npm pack` ignores root-level `.gitignore` & `.npmignore` file exclusion directives when run in a workspace or with a workspace flag (ie. `--workspaces`, `--workspace=<name>`). Anyone who has run `npm pack` or `npm publish` with workspaces, as of [v7.9.0](https://github.com/npm/cli/releases/tag/v7.9.0) & [v7.13.0](https://github.com/npm/cli/releases/tag/v7.13.0) respectively, may be affected and have published files into the npm registry they did not intend to include. ### Patch - Up
Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource in NPM
An issue was discovered in an npm 5.7.0 2018-02-21 pre-release (marked as "next: 5.7.0" and therefore automatically installed by an "npm upgrade -g npm" command, and also announced in the vendor's blog without mention of pre-release status). It might allow local users to bypass intended filesystem access restrictions because ownerships of /etc and /usr directories are being changed unexpectedly, related to a "correctMkdir" issue.
Local Privilege Escalation in npm
Affected versions of `npm` use predictable temporary file names during archive unpacking. If an attacker can create a symbolic link at the location of one of these temporary file names, the attacker can arbitrarily write to any file that the user which owns the `npm` process has permission to write to, potentially resulting in local privilege escalation. ## Recommendation Update to version 1.3.3 or later.
npm CLI exposing sensitive information through logs
Versions of the npm CLI prior to 6.14.6 are vulnerable to an information exposure vulnerability through log files. The CLI supports URLs like `<protocol>://[<user>[:<password>]@]<hostname>[:<port>][:][/]<path>`. The password value is not redacted and is printed to stdout and also to any generated log files.
npm Vulnerable to Global node_modules Binary Overwrite
Versions of the npm CLI prior to 6.13.4 are vulnerable to a Global node_modules Binary Overwrite. It fails to prevent existing globally-installed binaries to be overwritten by other package installations. For example, if a package was installed globally and created a `serve` binary, any subsequent installs of packages that also create a `serve` binary would overwrite the first binary. This will not overwrite system binaries but only binaries put into the global node_modules directory. This b
Click any tool to inspect its schema.
Be the first to review
Have you used this server?
Share your experience — it helps other developers decide.
Sign in to write a review.
Others in ai-ml
Dynamic problem-solving through sequential thought chains
Persistent memory using a knowledge graph
An autonomous agent that conducts deep research on any data using any LLM providers
🌊 The leading agent orchestration platform for Claude. Deploy intelligent multi-agent swarms, coordinate autonomous workflows, and build conversational AI systems. Features enterprise-grade architecture, distributed swarm intelligence, RAG integration, and native Claude Code / Codex Integration
MCP Security Weekly
Get CVE alerts and security updates for io.github.qinisolabs/floodwise and similar servers.
Start a conversation
Ask a question, share a tip, or report an issue.
Sign in to join the discussion.
England flood-risk by postcode for AI agents — verified Environment Agency data, not guesses.
Verified, trustworthy data tools for AI agents. "Qiniso" means "truth" in Zulu.
Website · npm · MCP Registry
Ask an LLM "what's the flood risk at SW1A 1AA?" and it will answer confidently — but it cannot know: per-postcode flood risk is specific, curated data that lives in a government dataset, not in a model's weights. floodwise looks the postcode up in the Environment Agency's official "Flood risk: postcode search tool" data and returns the real long-term risk band — or an honest "not found" instead of a guess.
floodwise runs locally over stdio (no key, no login). Once it's on npm, add it under mcpServers in your client config:
{ "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "floodwise"] }
npm i floodwise
import { floodRiskByPostcode, validatePostcode } from "floodwise";
floodRiskByPostcode("SW1A 1AA");
// {
// postcode: "SW1A 1AA", found: true, headlineRisk: "Very Low",
// addressesAtRisk: { high: 0, medium: 0, low: 0 }, groundwater: "Unlikely",
// coverage: "England", dataset: "ea-official", ...
// }
floodRiskByPostcode("EH1 1AA").found; // false — valid postcode, but Scotland (out of EA coverage), no guess
validatePostcode("ec1a1bb"); // { valid: true, postcode: "EC1A 1BB", outcode: "EC1A", incode: "1BB" }
Postcodes are accepted spaced or unspaced, any case. A well-formed postcode that isn't in the loaded England dataset returns found: false with a clear note — it never invents a risk level.
| Tool | What it answers |
|---|---|
| flood_risk_by_postcode | The EA long-term flood-risk band (High/Medium/Low/Very Low) for an England postcode, address counts per band, and the groundwater indication |
| validate_postcode | Is this a well-formed UK postcode? (deterministic format check + outcode/incode split) |
The flood data is the Environment Agency "Flood risk: postcode search tool data" (England), published as open data under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Each postcode carries the number of addresses whose surrounding area is at high (≥3.3%/yr), medium (1–3.3%) or low (0.1–1%) long-term risk from rivers, sea or surface water (the highest of these), plus a separate groundwater Possible/Unlikely indication. Refreshed roughly quarterly.
This repository ships an illustrative starter sample (non-geographic
ZZpseudo-postcodes) so tests run out of the box — every response from it is taggeddataset: "sample". To load the real data, downloadPostcodes_Risk_Assessment_All.csvfrom data.gov.uk / the Defra Data Services Platform and run:npm run build-data /path/to/Postcodes_Risk_Assessment_All.csv 2025-Q4 npm run build && npm test
Attribution: *Contains public sector information licensed under t