An MCP server built around Donella Meadow's book "Thinking in Systems, a primer"
Config is the same across clients — only the file and path differ.
{
"mcpServers": {
"mcp-server-systems-thinking": {
"command": "<see-readme>",
"args": []
}
}
}Are you the author?
Add this badge to your README to show your security score and help users find safe servers.
Deliver a Systems‑Thinking MCP server that lets an AI agent submit a full systems‑thinking representation (single JSON document) over HTTP. The server validates structure, persists the latest version atomically, and returns validation gaps so the agent can iterate until the document is complete.
No automated test available for this server. Check the GitHub README for setup instructions.
Five weighted categories — click any category to see the underlying evidence.
No known CVEs.
No package registry to scan.
Click any tool to inspect its schema.
Be the first to review
Have you used this server?
Share your experience — it helps other developers decide.
Sign in to write a review.
Others in education
A Model Context Protocol server for searching and analyzing arXiv papers
MCP server for NotebookLM - Let your AI agents (Claude Code, Codex) research documentation directly with grounded, citation-backed answers from Gemini. Persistent auth, library management, cross-client sharing. Zero hallucinations, just your knowledge base.
A MCP server that integrates the Semantic Scholar API and the arXiv API so AI assistants (e.g. Claude Code, Cursor) can search and fetch academic paper metadata.
MCP server that uses arxiv-to-prompt to fetch and process arXiv LaTeX sources for precise interpretation of mathematical expressions in scientific papers.
MCP Security Weekly
Get CVE alerts and security updates for Mcp Server Systems Thinking and similar servers.
Start a conversation
Ask a question, share a tip, or report an issue.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Deliver a Systems‑Thinking MCP server that lets an AI agent submit a full systems‑thinking representation (single JSON document) over HTTP. The server validates structure, persists the latest version atomically, and returns validation gaps so the agent can iterate until the document is complete.
Sequential‑thinking servers proved that forcing LLMs through a rigid I/O contract improves reasoning quality. We apply the same pattern to Donella Meadows‑style systems analysis, enabling agents to reason about boundaries, stocks/flows, feedback loops, and leverage points with minimal server logic.
systems_thinking_writer (PUT/POST full JSON each time)| Persona | Job‑to‑be‑Done |
|---|---|
| LLM Agent | Build a complete systems model iteratively; keep retrying until validation passes |
| System Analyst | Fetch the current JSON document for visualization or manual review |
| DevOps | Deploy and monitor the MCP service |
systems_thinking_writer{ complete: boolean, missing_fields: string[], inconsistency_warnings: string[] }complete === true only when both arrays are empty.| Method | Path | Body | Response |
|---|---|---|---|
| POST | /model | JSON doc | Validation result & copy of stored doc |
| GET | /model | – | Latest stored doc |
Server overwrites existing doc on every successful POST.
flow.from_stock & flow.to_stock must have matching stocks.idleverage_point.is_applicable === true there must be at least one matching intervention.target_leverage_id{
"version": "1.0.0",
"system_name": "string",
"boundary": { "purpose": "string", "scope_in": [""], "scope_out": [""] },
"elements": ["string"],
"interconnections": [ { "from": "", "to": "", "type": "causal|flow|info" } ],
"stocks": [ { "id": "", "unit": "", "description": "" } ],
"flows": [ { "id": "", "from_stock": "", "to_stock": "", "rate_expr": "" } ],
"loops": {
"balancing": [ { "id": "", "description": "" } ],
"reinforcing": [ { "id": "", "description": "" } ]
},
"leverage_points": [ { "id": 12, "label": "Constants / parameters", "is_applicable": false }, … ],
"interventions": [ { "target_leverage_id": 4, "proposal": "…", "expected_effect": "…", "confidence": 0.7 } ]
}