Side-by-side MCP server comparison
Short answer: pick io.github.mims-harvard/tooluniverse. It scores 96/100 to Argo's 90/100, and it exposes 4 tools to Argo's 1, and it has 1,754 GitHub stars against 200. Argo is still worth a look if you are already invested in it - the full breakdown below shows exactly where the 6 points go.
Last updated
| Metric | Argo | io.github.mims-harvard/tooluniverse |
|---|---|---|
| MCPpedia Score | 90 | 96 |
| Security Score | 30 | 30 |
| Maintenance Score | 15 | 21 |
| GitHub Stars | 200 | 1.8k |
| Weekly Downloads | 57.8k | 2263.3k |
| Tools | 1 | 4 |
| Est. Token Cost | 150 | 600 |
| Open CVEs | 0 | 0 |
| Health | Active | Active |
| Auth Required | No | No |
| Transport | stdio, sse, http | stdio, sse, http |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| API Pricing | unknown | free |
io.github.mims-harvard/tooluniverse leads with a score of 96 (A), ahead of Argo's 90 (A).
Compare up to 4 servers: mcppedia.org/compare/server-a-vs-server-b-vs-server-c