Side-by-side MCP server comparison
Short answer: it is close. Arxiv MCP Server scores 95/100 and Context7 scores 97/100 — a 2-point gap, which is inside the noise of a weekly rescore. Context7 exposes 2 tools against Arxiv MCP Server's 4, so the choice comes down to whether you need that extra surface area or would rather keep your context window small.
Last updated
| Metric | Arxiv Mcp Server | Context7 |
|---|---|---|
| MCPpedia Score | 95 | 97 |
| Security Score | 30 | 30 |
| Maintenance Score | 20 | 22 |
| GitHub Stars | 3.1k | 61.1k |
| Weekly Downloads | 7.9k | 789.1k |
| Tools | 4 | 2 |
| Est. Token Cost | 600 | 300 |
| Open CVEs | 0 | 0 |
| Health | Active | Active |
| Auth Required | No | No |
| Transport | stdio, http | stdio, http |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| API Pricing | free | freemium |
Context7 and Arxiv Mcp Server are closely matched at the top with scores of 97 and 95. Check each server's detail page to decide which fits your use case.
Compare up to 4 servers: mcppedia.org/compare/server-a-vs-server-b-vs-server-c