Side-by-side MCP server comparison
Short answer: it is close. com.fnlowl/fnlowl scores 90/100 and io.github.qmmughal/titan-email-mcp scores 91/100 - a 1-point gap, which is inside the noise of a weekly rescore. io.github.qmmughal/titan-email-mcp exposes 6 tools against com.fnlowl/fnlowl's 3, so the choice comes down to whether you need that extra surface area or would rather keep your context window small.
Last updated
| Metric | com.fnlowl/fnlowl | io.github.qmmughal/titan-email-mcp |
|---|---|---|
| MCPpedia Score | 90 | 91 |
| Security Score | 30 | 30 |
| Maintenance Score | 15 | 16 |
| GitHub Stars | 0 | 0 |
| Weekly Downloads | 2263.3k | 114 |
| Tools | 3 | 6 |
| Est. Token Cost | 450 | 900 |
| Open CVEs | 0 | 0 |
| Health | Active | Active |
| Auth Required | No | Yes |
| Transport | http | stdio, sse |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| API Pricing | unknown | freemium |
io.github.qmmughal/titan-email-mcp and com.fnlowl/fnlowl are closely matched at the top with scores of 91 and 90. Check each server's detail page to decide which fits your use case.
Compare up to 4 servers: mcppedia.org/compare/server-a-vs-server-b-vs-server-c