Side-by-side MCP server comparison
Short answer: it is close. com.luthersystems.insideout/mcp scores 90/100 and io.github.patrickchugh/terravision scores 89/100 - a 1-point gap, which is inside the noise of a weekly rescore. com.luthersystems.insideout/mcp exposes 8 tools against io.github.patrickchugh/terravision's 9, so the choice comes down to whether you need that extra surface area or would rather keep your context window small.
Last updated
| Metric | com.luthersystems.insideout/mcp | io.github.patrickchugh/terravision |
|---|---|---|
| MCPpedia Score | 90 | 89 |
| Security Score | 30 | 30 |
| Maintenance Score | 15 | 14 |
| GitHub Stars | 0 | 1.7k |
| Weekly Downloads | 2263.3k | 0 |
| Tools | 8 | 9 |
| Est. Token Cost | 1.2k | 1.4k |
| Open CVEs | 0 | 0 |
| Health | Active | Active |
| Auth Required | No | No |
| Transport | http, stdio | http |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| API Pricing | unknown | freemium |
com.luthersystems.insideout/mcp and io.github.patrickchugh/terravision are closely matched at the top with scores of 90 and 89. Check each server's detail page to decide which fits your use case.
Compare up to 4 servers: mcppedia.org/compare/server-a-vs-server-b-vs-server-c