Side-by-side MCP server comparison
Short answer: it is close. com.luthersystems.insideout/mcp scores 90/100 and MCP Server Kubernetes scores 91/100 - a 1-point gap, which is inside the noise of a weekly rescore. MCP Server Kubernetes exposes 22 tools against com.luthersystems.insideout/mcp's 8, so the choice comes down to whether you need that extra surface area or would rather keep your context window small.
Last updated
| Metric | com.luthersystems.insideout/mcp | Mcp Server Kubernetes |
|---|---|---|
| MCPpedia Score | 90 | 91 |
| Security Score | 30 | 30 |
| Maintenance Score | 15 | 20 |
| GitHub Stars | 0 | 1.6k |
| Weekly Downloads | 2263.3k | 2.5k |
| Tools | 8 | 22 |
| Est. Token Cost | 1.2k | 3.3k |
| Open CVEs | 0 | 0 |
| Health | Active | Active |
| Auth Required | No | Yes |
| Transport | http, stdio | stdio, sse, http |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| API Pricing | unknown | free |
Mcp Server Kubernetes and com.luthersystems.insideout/mcp are closely matched at the top with scores of 91 and 90. Check each server's detail page to decide which fits your use case.
Compare up to 4 servers: mcppedia.org/compare/server-a-vs-server-b-vs-server-c