Side-by-side MCP server comparison
Short answer: pick Mcp_agent_mail. It scores 96/100 to io.github.ArtyMcLabin/Gmail-MCP-Server's 86/100, and it has 2,111 GitHub stars against 228. io.github.ArtyMcLabin/Gmail-MCP-Server is still worth a look if you are already invested in it — the full breakdown below shows exactly where the 10 points go.
Last updated
| Metric | io.github.ArtyMcLabin/Gmail-MCP-Server | Mcp_agent_mail |
|---|---|---|
| MCPpedia Score | 86 | 96 |
| Security Score | 30 | 30 |
| Maintenance Score | 15 | 21 |
| GitHub Stars | 228 | 2.1k |
| Weekly Downloads | 444 | 19188.3k |
| Tools | 21 | 6 |
| Est. Token Cost | 3.1k | 900 |
| Open CVEs | 0 | 0 |
| Health | Active | Active |
| Auth Required | Yes | No |
| Transport | stdio, sse, http | http |
| License | MIT | NOASSERTION |
| API Pricing | freemium | free |
Mcp_agent_mail leads with a score of 96 (A), ahead of io.github.ArtyMcLabin/Gmail-MCP-Server's 86 (A).
Compare up to 4 servers: mcppedia.org/compare/server-a-vs-server-b-vs-server-c