Side-by-side MCP server comparison
Short answer: it is close. io.github.atc07/sheets-mcp scores 92/100 and Superlocalmemory MCP Server scores 94/100 - a 2-point gap, which is inside the noise of a weekly rescore. Superlocalmemory MCP Server exposes 6 tools against io.github.atc07/sheets-mcp's 2, so the choice comes down to whether you need that extra surface area or would rather keep your context window small.
Last updated
| Metric | io.github.atc07/sheets-mcp | Superlocalmemory MCP Server |
|---|---|---|
| MCPpedia Score | 92 | 94 |
| Security Score | 30 | 30 |
| Maintenance Score | 17 | 19 |
| GitHub Stars | 35 | 254 |
| Weekly Downloads | 258 | 1.1k |
| Tools | 2 | 6 |
| Est. Token Cost | 300 | 900 |
| Open CVEs | 0 | 0 |
| Health | Active | Active |
| Auth Required | No | No |
| Transport | stdio, http | stdio |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| API Pricing | freemium | free |
Superlocalmemory MCP Server and io.github.atc07/sheets-mcp are closely matched at the top with scores of 94 and 92. Check each server's detail page to decide which fits your use case.
Compare up to 4 servers: mcppedia.org/compare/server-a-vs-server-b-vs-server-c