Side-by-side MCP server comparison
Short answer: it is close. Obsidian Sync MCP Server scores 93/100 and Superlocalmemory MCP Server scores 94/100 — a 1-point gap, which is inside the noise of a weekly rescore. Superlocalmemory MCP Server exposes 6 tools against Obsidian Sync MCP Server's 9, so the choice comes down to whether you need that extra surface area or would rather keep your context window small.
Last updated
| Metric | Obsidian Sync MCP Server | Superlocalmemory MCP Server |
|---|---|---|
| MCPpedia Score | 93 | 94 |
| Security Score | 30 | 30 |
| Maintenance Score | 18 | 19 |
| GitHub Stars | 48 | 221 |
| Weekly Downloads | 24.0k | 3.0k |
| Tools | 9 | 6 |
| Est. Token Cost | 1.4k | 900 |
| Open CVEs | 0 | 0 |
| Health | Active | Active |
| Auth Required | No | No |
| Transport | stdio, http | stdio |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| API Pricing | free | free |
Superlocalmemory MCP Server and Obsidian Sync MCP Server are closely matched at the top with scores of 94 and 93. Check each server's detail page to decide which fits your use case.
Compare up to 4 servers: mcppedia.org/compare/server-a-vs-server-b-vs-server-c