Side-by-side MCP server comparison
Short answer: it is close. io.github.Atomic-Mail/mcp scores 94/100 and Mcp_agent_mail scores 96/100 — a 2-point gap, which is inside the noise of a weekly rescore. Mcp_agent_mail exposes 6 tools against io.github.Atomic-Mail/mcp's 1, so the choice comes down to whether you need that extra surface area or would rather keep your context window small.
Last updated
| Metric | io.github.Atomic-Mail/mcp | Mcp_agent_mail |
|---|---|---|
| MCPpedia Score | 94 | 96 |
| Security Score | 29 | 30 |
| Maintenance Score | 20 | 21 |
| GitHub Stars | 267 | 2.1k |
| Weekly Downloads | 15476.0k | 19188.3k |
| Tools | 1 | 6 |
| Est. Token Cost | 150 | 900 |
| Open CVEs | 0 | 0 |
| Health | Active | Active |
| Auth Required | No | No |
| Transport | stdio, sse, http | http |
| License | MIT | NOASSERTION |
| API Pricing | freemium | free |
Mcp_agent_mail and io.github.Atomic-Mail/mcp are closely matched at the top with scores of 96 and 94. Mcp_agent_mail edges ahead on security. Check each server's detail page to decide which fits your use case.
Compare up to 4 servers: mcppedia.org/compare/server-a-vs-server-b-vs-server-c