Side-by-side MCP server comparison
Short answer: it is close. io.github.bitterdev/enpass-mcp scores 90/100 and io.github.wyre-technology/rocketcyber-mcp scores 92/100 — a 2-point gap, which is inside the noise of a weekly rescore. io.github.wyre-technology/rocketcyber-mcp exposes 8 tools against io.github.bitterdev/enpass-mcp's 7, so the choice comes down to whether you need that extra surface area or would rather keep your context window small.
Last updated
| Metric | io.github.bitterdev/enpass-mcp | io.github.wyre-technology/rocketcyber-mcp |
|---|---|---|
| MCPpedia Score | 90 | 92 |
| Security Score | 30 | 30 |
| Maintenance Score | 15 | 17 |
| GitHub Stars | 1 | 0 |
| Weekly Downloads | 15493.7k | 15493.7k |
| Tools | 7 | 8 |
| Est. Token Cost | 1.1k | 1.2k |
| Open CVEs | 0 | 0 |
| Health | Active | Active |
| Auth Required | No | No |
| Transport | stdio, sse | stdio, http |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| API Pricing | freemium | freemium |
io.github.wyre-technology/rocketcyber-mcp and io.github.bitterdev/enpass-mcp are closely matched at the top with scores of 92 and 90. Check each server's detail page to decide which fits your use case.
Compare up to 4 servers: mcppedia.org/compare/server-a-vs-server-b-vs-server-c