Side-by-side MCP server comparison
Short answer: it is close. io.github.mims-harvard/tooluniverse scores 96/100 and io.github.vshulcz/deja-vu scores 94/100 - a 2-point gap, which is inside the noise of a weekly rescore. io.github.mims-harvard/tooluniverse exposes 4 tools against io.github.vshulcz/deja-vu's 6, so the choice comes down to whether you need that extra surface area or would rather keep your context window small.
Last updated
| Metric | io.github.mims-harvard/tooluniverse | io.github.vshulcz/deja-vu |
|---|---|---|
| MCPpedia Score | 96 | 94 |
| Security Score | 30 | 30 |
| Maintenance Score | 21 | 19 |
| GitHub Stars | 1.8k | 1.3k |
| Weekly Downloads | 2263.3k | 1.2k |
| Tools | 4 | 6 |
| Est. Token Cost | 600 | 900 |
| Open CVEs | 0 | 0 |
| Health | Active | Active |
| Auth Required | No | No |
| Transport | stdio, sse, http | stdio, sse |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| API Pricing | free | freemium |
io.github.mims-harvard/tooluniverse and io.github.vshulcz/deja-vu are closely matched at the top with scores of 96 and 94. Check each server's detail page to decide which fits your use case.
Compare up to 4 servers: mcppedia.org/compare/server-a-vs-server-b-vs-server-c