Side-by-side MCP server comparison
Short answer: pick Mcp_agent_mail. It scores 96/100 to Server's 85/100, and it exposes 6 tools to Server's 2, and it has 2,111 GitHub stars against 32. Server is still worth a look if you are already invested in it — the full breakdown below shows exactly where the 11 points go.
Last updated
| Metric | Server | Mcp_agent_mail |
|---|---|---|
| MCPpedia Score | 85 | 96 |
| Security Score | 30 | 30 |
| Maintenance Score | 10 | 21 |
| GitHub Stars | 32 | 2.1k |
| Weekly Downloads | 0 | 19188.3k |
| Tools | 2 | 6 |
| Est. Token Cost | 300 | 900 |
| Open CVEs | 0 | 0 |
| Health | Maintained | Active |
| Auth Required | No | No |
| Transport | stdio, http | http |
| License | Unknown | NOASSERTION |
| API Pricing | freemium | free |
Mcp_agent_mail leads with a score of 96 (A), ahead of Server's 85 (A).
Compare up to 4 servers: mcppedia.org/compare/server-a-vs-server-b-vs-server-c