Side-by-side MCP server comparison
Short answer: it is close. io.github.sevalla-hosting/mcp scores 84/100 and MCP Server Kubernetes scores 85/100 — a 1-point gap, which is inside the noise of a weekly rescore. MCP Server Kubernetes exposes 22 tools against io.github.sevalla-hosting/mcp's 2, so the choice comes down to whether you need that extra surface area or would rather keep your context window small.
Last updated
| Metric | io.github.sevalla-hosting/mcp | Mcp Server Kubernetes |
|---|---|---|
| MCPpedia Score | 84 | 85 |
| Security Score | 27 | 30 |
| Maintenance Score | 12 | 14 |
| GitHub Stars | 7 | 1.6k |
| Weekly Downloads | 172345.3k | 10.1k |
| Tools | 2 | 22 |
| Est. Token Cost | 300 | 3.3k |
| Open CVEs | 0 | 0 |
| Health | Active | Active |
| Auth Required | No | Yes |
| Transport | http | stdio, sse, http |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| API Pricing | freemium | free |
Mcp Server Kubernetes and io.github.sevalla-hosting/mcp are closely matched at the top with scores of 85 and 84. Mcp Server Kubernetes edges ahead on security. Check each server's detail page to decide which fits your use case.
Compare up to 4 servers: mcppedia.org/compare/server-a-vs-server-b-vs-server-c