Side-by-side MCP server comparison
Short answer: pick io.github.vmoranv/jshookmcp. It scores 95/100 to io.github.wiresage/mikrotik-mcp's 90/100, and it has 2,059 GitHub stars against 304. io.github.wiresage/mikrotik-mcp is still worth a look if you are already invested in it - the full breakdown below shows exactly where the 5 points go.
Last updated
| Metric | io.github.vmoranv/jshookmcp | io.github.wiresage/mikrotik-mcp |
|---|---|---|
| MCPpedia Score | 95 | 90 |
| Security Score | 30 | 30 |
| Maintenance Score | 20 | 15 |
| GitHub Stars | 2.1k | 304 |
| Weekly Downloads | 645 | 0 |
| Tools | 2 | 6 |
| Est. Token Cost | 300 | 900 |
| Open CVEs | 0 | 0 |
| Health | Active | Active |
| Auth Required | No | No |
| Transport | stdio, sse, http | stdio, sse, http |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| API Pricing | freemium | freemium |
io.github.vmoranv/jshookmcp leads with a score of 95 (A), ahead of io.github.wiresage/mikrotik-mcp's 90 (A).
Compare up to 4 servers: mcppedia.org/compare/server-a-vs-server-b-vs-server-c