Side-by-side MCP server comparison
Short answer: pick Mcp_agent_mail. It scores 96/100 to Resend MCP's 91/100, and it has 2,114 GitHub stars against 565. Resend MCP is still worth a look if you are already invested in it — the full breakdown below shows exactly where the 5 points go.
Last updated
| Metric | Mcp_agent_mail | Resend Mcp |
|---|---|---|
| MCPpedia Score | 96 | 91 |
| Security Score | 30 | 30 |
| Maintenance Score | 21 | 20 |
| GitHub Stars | 2.1k | 565 |
| Weekly Downloads | 19441.9k | 172345.3k |
| Tools | 6 | 29 |
| Est. Token Cost | 900 | 4.3k |
| Open CVEs | 0 | 0 |
| Health | Active | Active |
| Auth Required | No | Yes |
| Transport | http | stdio, sse, http |
| License | NOASSERTION | MIT |
| API Pricing | free | freemium |
Mcp_agent_mail leads with a score of 96 (A), ahead of Resend Mcp's 91 (A).
Compare up to 4 servers: mcppedia.org/compare/server-a-vs-server-b-vs-server-c