Side-by-side MCP server comparison
Short answer: it is close. cloud.tiniest/tiniest-cloud scores 92/100 and io.github.zenml-io/mcp-zenml scores 93/100 - a 1-point gap, which is inside the noise of a weekly rescore. io.github.zenml-io/mcp-zenml exposes 17 tools against cloud.tiniest/tiniest-cloud's 1, so the choice comes down to whether you need that extra surface area or would rather keep your context window small.
Last updated
| Metric | cloud.tiniest/tiniest-cloud | io.github.zenml-io/mcp-zenml |
|---|---|---|
| MCPpedia Score | 92 | 93 |
| Security Score | 30 | 30 |
| Maintenance Score | 17 | 18 |
| GitHub Stars | 0 | 49 |
| Weekly Downloads | 2263.3k | 98.7k |
| Tools | 1 | 17 |
| Est. Token Cost | 150 | 2.5k |
| Open CVEs | 0 | 0 |
| Health | Active | Active |
| Auth Required | No | No |
| Transport | http | stdio, sse, http |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| API Pricing | unknown | freemium |
io.github.zenml-io/mcp-zenml and cloud.tiniest/tiniest-cloud are closely matched at the top with scores of 93 and 92. Check each server's detail page to decide which fits your use case.
Compare up to 4 servers: mcppedia.org/compare/server-a-vs-server-b-vs-server-c