Side-by-side MCP server comparison
Short answer: it is close. io.github.zenml-io/mcp-zenml scores 93/100 and Tachyon scores 93/100 - a 0-point gap, which is inside the noise of a weekly rescore. io.github.zenml-io/mcp-zenml exposes 17 tools against Tachyon's 6, so the choice comes down to whether you need that extra surface area or would rather keep your context window small.
Last updated
| Metric | io.github.zenml-io/mcp-zenml | Tachyon |
|---|---|---|
| MCPpedia Score | 93 | 93 |
| Security Score | 30 | 30 |
| Maintenance Score | 18 | 18 |
| GitHub Stars | 49 | 37 |
| Weekly Downloads | 98.7k | 2263.3k |
| Tools | 17 | 6 |
| Est. Token Cost | 2.5k | 900 |
| Open CVEs | 0 | 0 |
| Health | Active | Active |
| Auth Required | No | No |
| Transport | stdio, sse, http | stdio, sse, http |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| API Pricing | freemium | unknown |
io.github.zenml-io/mcp-zenml and Tachyon are closely matched at the top with scores of 93 and 93. Check each server's detail page to decide which fits your use case.
Compare up to 4 servers: mcppedia.org/compare/server-a-vs-server-b-vs-server-c