Side-by-side MCP server comparison
Short answer: it is close. Ruflo scores 95/100 and XcodeBuildMCP scores 95/100 — a 0-point gap, which is inside the noise of a weekly rescore. Ruflo exposes 4 tools against XcodeBuildMCP's 2, so the choice comes down to whether you need that extra surface area or would rather keep your context window small.
Last updated
| Metric | Ruflo | XcodeBuildMCP |
|---|---|---|
| MCPpedia Score | 95 | 95 |
| Security Score | 30 | 30 |
| Maintenance Score | 20 | 20 |
| GitHub Stars | 69.4k | 6.3k |
| Weekly Downloads | 47.4k | 169.9k |
| Tools | 4 | 2 |
| Est. Token Cost | 600 | 300 |
| Open CVEs | 0 | 0 |
| Health | Active | Active |
| Auth Required | No | No |
| Transport | stdio, sse, http | stdio |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| API Pricing | free | free |
Ruflo and XcodeBuildMCP are closely matched at the top with scores of 95 and 95. Check each server's detail page to decide which fits your use case.
Compare up to 4 servers: mcppedia.org/compare/server-a-vs-server-b-vs-server-c