Side-by-side MCP server comparison
Short answer: it is close. Komodo MCP Server scores 93/100 and io.github.zenml-io/mcp-zenml scores 91/100 — a 2-point gap, which is inside the noise of a weekly rescore. Komodo MCP Server exposes 11 tools against io.github.zenml-io/mcp-zenml's 17, so the choice comes down to whether you need that extra surface area or would rather keep your context window small.
Last updated
| Metric | Komodo MCP Server | io.github.zenml-io/mcp-zenml |
|---|---|---|
| MCPpedia Score | 93 | 91 |
| Security Score | 30 | 30 |
| Maintenance Score | 18 | 16 |
| GitHub Stars | 19 | 49 |
| Weekly Downloads | 260.0k | 188.2k |
| Tools | 11 | 17 |
| Est. Token Cost | 1.6k | 2.5k |
| Open CVEs | 0 | 0 |
| Health | Active | Active |
| Auth Required | Yes | No |
| Transport | stdio, sse, http | stdio, sse, http |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| API Pricing | free | freemium |
Komodo MCP Server and io.github.zenml-io/mcp-zenml are closely matched at the top with scores of 93 and 91. Check each server's detail page to decide which fits your use case.
Compare up to 4 servers: mcppedia.org/compare/server-a-vs-server-b-vs-server-c