Side-by-side MCP server comparison
Short answer: pick Komodo MCP Server. It scores 93/100 to Komodo MCP Server's 88/100, and it scores higher across the weighted security, maintenance and documentation inputs. Komodo MCP Server is still worth a look if you are already invested in it — the full breakdown below shows exactly where the 5 points go.
Last updated
| Metric | Komodo MCP Server | Komodo Mcp Server |
|---|---|---|
| MCPpedia Score | 93 | 88 |
| Security Score | 30 | 30 |
| Maintenance Score | 18 | 13 |
| GitHub Stars | 19 | 19 |
| Weekly Downloads | 272.2k | 187 |
| Tools | 11 | 11 |
| Est. Token Cost | 1.6k | 1.6k |
| Open CVEs | 0 | 0 |
| Health | Active | Active |
| Auth Required | Yes | Yes |
| Transport | stdio, sse, http | stdio, sse, http |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| API Pricing | free | free |
Komodo MCP Server leads with a score of 93 (A), ahead of Komodo Mcp Server's 88 (A).
Compare up to 4 servers: mcppedia.org/compare/server-a-vs-server-b-vs-server-c